Trinity MUGEN

Other STUFF => Random Shit Mk II => Topic started by: Insanius on May 12, 2009, 01:35:13 PM

Title: We're not doomed.
Post by: Insanius on May 12, 2009, 01:35:13 PM
This is the antithesis of http://trinitymugen.net/forum/index.php?topic=889.0

First up, ISPs refuse to police the internet.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8046028.stm
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Jesuszilla on May 12, 2009, 04:06:20 PM
Heh. That figures. The Internet is really too damn big to police.
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: The_None on May 13, 2009, 06:41:45 AM
Too bad something tells me that the good news ratio to the bad ones will probrably come out something like 1:1000000000000.
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Anjel on May 13, 2009, 07:04:09 AM
Quote from: The_None on May 13, 2009, 06:41:45 AM
Too bad something tells me that the good news ratio to the bad ones will probrably come out something like 1:1000000000000.

I feel the same way.
And especially here in Sweden, they want to police EVERYTHING.
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Jesuszilla on May 13, 2009, 10:33:35 PM
No shit. Your courts are partially the reason most of this shit's being brought down in the first place (what with the Pirate Bay and all).
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Fusion on May 28, 2009, 09:19:02 AM
Another beacon of light (http://www.zeropaid.com/news/86315/harvard-prof-calls-riaa-lawsuits-unconstitutional-abuse-of-law/).
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Jesuszilla on May 28, 2009, 02:55:06 PM
QuoteNesson also makes the point that when Congress wrote the Copyright Act it surely never intended to allow copyright holders to target "pro se noncommercial defendants," those acquiring content for personal use. This is surely the case and something it needs to take up if copyright law is ever to catch up to the social realities of a digital world.

YES
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: The_None on June 01, 2009, 04:30:56 AM
You know, after OhBummer brought some RIAA-butsecksers to the so-called "Departament of Justice", my fears have bene verified that OhBummer is nothing but a tool wait WHAT?! (http://news.slashdot.org/story/09/05/31/1521236/Obama-DoJ-Goes-Against-Film-Companies)
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Fusion on June 10, 2009, 10:54:38 PM
The three strikes law struck out. (http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/06/french-court-savages-3-strikes-law-tosses-it-out.ars)
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Fusion on June 25, 2009, 11:08:02 AM
NOW do you see the problem with policing the internet? (http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/06/24/riaa.forced.settle/)
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Jesuszilla on June 25, 2009, 07:48:59 PM
Indeed.
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: The_None on July 09, 2009, 07:58:24 AM
I'd wish I would learn some Spanish now. (http://torrentfreak.com/judge-rules-p2p-legal-sites-to-be-presumed-innocent-090707/)
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Fusion on July 19, 2009, 09:45:13 PM
It's just another bunch of RIAA bull- (http://torrentfreak.com/drm-is-dead-riaa-says-090719/)

QuoteJonathan Lamy, chief spokesperson for the RIAA declared DRM dead, when he was asked about the RIAA's view on DRM for an upcoming SCMagazine article. "DRM is dead, isn't it?" Lamy said, referring to the DRM-less iTunes store and other online outfits that now offer music without restrictions.
...Wait...






What?
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: K.O.D on July 20, 2009, 04:41:22 AM
FUCK YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH

WE WIN WE WIN



















or it might just be a trap.
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Brandy Bogard on July 30, 2009, 08:14:13 PM
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Bigsally on August 11, 2009, 02:51:41 PM
Thats kool. im still gonna buy my music from the store cuz i love coporations  :pedo:
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Fusion on September 18, 2009, 03:53:10 PM
FCC takes matters into it's own hands (http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE58H59A20090918).

Long story short: The FCC is saying that all content shall be treated equally, that no ISP should legally be allowed to cut off access based on content.
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Jesuszilla on September 18, 2009, 09:11:08 PM
If all content is treated equally, then wouldn't that place CP on the same level as the bible?
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: The_None on October 14, 2009, 02:20:57 PM
At least we're still allowed to speak against a certain organization, yet.... (http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/10/magistrate-clears-blogger-riaa-of-vexatious-charges/)
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: The_None on November 16, 2009, 12:55:30 PM
They forgot to disarm a certain bomb. Alas, them fixing this would be inevitable. (http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/11/15/2119230/Copyright-Time-Bomb-Set-To-Go-Off)
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Jesuszilla on November 16, 2009, 12:57:17 PM
o_O
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Fusion on November 16, 2009, 04:46:17 PM
Well, I think he's on our side for the moment. (http://www.myfoxdc.com/dpp/news/dpg_Obama_China_Internet_fc_200911161258371717026)
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Jango on November 16, 2009, 05:21:28 PM
QuoteHe added he's a "big supporter of non-censorship,"

Maybe after this he can go to Japan and tell them to stop putting mosaic on all of their porn.
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: The_None on November 17, 2009, 06:04:56 AM
To the group of artists who don't quite think that suing fans and cutting their net connection is the right way (that included Moby and Radiohead), guess who has just recently joined. (http://torrentfreak.com/mc-hammer-stop-the-music-piracy-crackdown-091116/)

JZ, you know what to do.
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Jesuszilla on November 17, 2009, 11:06:51 AM
How ironic.

QuoteIn addition to calling for a stop to the legal battles, Hammer thinks the music labels should focus more on digital content instead of trying to sell plastic to a generation of people that have never even owned a standalone CD player.
I partially agree with this. I like CDs, and I still buy them because I want it to remain that way. There's a lot more that can go wrong with downloads (and I can safely say that, owning many tracks which have skipped considerably due to several hard drive transfers). Of course, that was all pirated music from YEARS ago... And I am actually considering going out and finding said CDs with the tracks mentioned because it is a lot more convenient to rip from a CD than to download them all again.
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Jango on November 18, 2009, 12:42:05 AM
I just buy CD's because I can actually control the sound quality of the rips. If I can't do that, amazon.com is awesome because the majority of their tracks are high quality VBA (or else a consistent 256 kbps)
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Fusion on December 07, 2009, 06:26:54 PM
The copyright hounds are getting hounded themselves (http://torrentfreak.com/record-labels-face-60-billion-damages-for-pirating-artists-091207/)
Title: I wasn't sure whenever I'd post it in "We're doomed" or "We're not"
Post by: The_None on February 24, 2010, 02:12:48 AM
One higher-up (that doesn't say much, but still) doesn't like (http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/02/23/0133240/EU-Privacy-Chief-Says-ACTA-Violates-European-Law) how's ACTA itself is shaping (http://www.boingboing.net/2010/02/21/acta-internet-enforc.html)
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: The_None on May 26, 2010, 12:47:24 PM
You can say that Karma has bit Warner in the ass (http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/100937-Warner-Bros-Sued-for-Pirating-Anti-Piracy-Technology)
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Jesuszilla on May 26, 2010, 01:00:22 PM
lmao
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Fusion on July 26, 2010, 02:40:16 PM
The DMCA receives some exemptions (http://corrupt, adulterating shitbags.com/5596568/new-dmca-rules-say-jailbreaking-your-iphone-is-okay?skyline=true&s=i).  Take them how you will.
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Jesuszilla on July 26, 2010, 05:47:03 PM
Tommy Wiseau can fuck off now.
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Tyrannosaurus Reich on July 26, 2010, 06:42:24 PM
I'm pretty sure Wiseau had nothing to do with removing the Critic's review of The Room. Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't he say that he actually likes the kind of publicity he is getting?
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: UHMEEEEBA on July 26, 2010, 07:13:09 PM
I believe the Rifftrax is still available if you absolutely must see the movie lampooned.
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Fusion on October 06, 2010, 03:51:12 PM
Looks like ACTA's losing steam (http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/5352/408/).
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Brandy Bogard on June 03, 2011, 08:29:06 AM
How does it feel to be violating human rights, France?! (http://torrentfreak.com/un-disconnecting-file-sharers-breaches-human-rights-110603/)
Title: Re: We're not doomed (my ass).
Post by: The_None on September 29, 2011, 02:30:34 AM
Considering recent circumstances (http://www.trinitymugen.net/forum/index.php?topic=889.msg24521#msg24521), someone please lock this topic, trash it into a bin, whatever. There's no point keeping this up at all when it's more than definite that we lost.
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Brandy Bogard on November 16, 2011, 07:44:14 PM
BaraCluny the Scourge Hundscheisse Obamau5 Obama might have some hope after all. (http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/192349-obama-threatens-to-veto-resolution-repealing-net-neutrality-rules)
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Brandy Bogard on November 22, 2011, 09:54:36 PM
Seems that the BSA came to its senses (http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/244501/business_software_alliance_withdraws_support_for_stop_online_piracy_act.html)
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Brandy Bogard on December 02, 2011, 05:59:59 AM
LOL (http://torrentfreak.com/copyright-corruption-scandal-surrounds-anti-piracy-campaign-111201/?_)
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Jesuszilla on December 02, 2011, 12:24:51 PM
I love hypocrisy on the enemy's side.
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Brandy Bogard on December 03, 2011, 08:37:46 AM
I love you, Switzerland (http://torrentfreak.com/swiss-govt-downloading-movies-and-music-will-stay-legal-111202/)



Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Brandy Bogard on January 10, 2012, 06:30:54 PM
So the "researcher" that Big Content turns to whenever they need distorted stats about piracy just came out against SOPAPIPA (http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120110/03502617362/nbc-universals-own-preferred-researcher-anti-piracy-stats-comes-out-against-sopapipa.shtml)
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Jesuszilla on January 12, 2012, 02:07:01 PM
Wait, what? The people that own UMG, that take down every fucking thing?


Is M. Night Shyamalan God or something?
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Brandy Bogard on January 12, 2012, 06:55:09 PM
LOL (http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/01/12/1054157/-Rep-Lamar-Smith,-SOPA-author,-is-a-copyright%C2%A0violator?via=blog_1)

I hope he gets involved in a fucking sex scandal!!
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Jesuszilla on January 14, 2012, 06:31:19 PM
Well now... (http://www.forbes.com/sites/insertcoin/2012/01/14/the-white-house-comes-out-against-sopa/)

EDIT: Also Bungie opposes SOPA (http://www.gamepolitics.com/2012/01/14/bungie-publicly-proclaims-its-opposition-sopa)
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Brandy Bogard on January 16, 2012, 09:10:18 AM
http://www.examiner.com/computers-in-denver/house-kills-sopa

http://www.examiner.com/computers-in-denver/house-kills-sopa

http://www.examiner.com/computers-in-denver/house-kills-sopa

http://www.examiner.com/computers-in-denver/house-kills-sopa

http://www.examiner.com/computers-in-denver/house-kills-sopa




[spoiler]Now we just have to worry about PIPA  :-X[/spoiler]
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Brandy Bogard on April 01, 2012, 11:07:05 PM
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2012/04/judge-rejects-copyright-trolls-bittorrent-conspiracy-theory.ars (http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2012/04/judge-rejects-copyright-trolls-bittorrent-conspiracy-theory.ars)

Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Brandy Bogard on October 12, 2012, 07:20:31 AM
http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/open-enterprise/2012/10/uk-snoopers-charter-19000-emails-against-0-in-favour/index.htm (http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/open-enterprise/2012/10/uk-snoopers-charter-19000-emails-against-0-in-favour/index.htm)

LOL
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Jesuszilla on November 14, 2012, 10:05:31 PM
http://www.austinchronicle.com/blogs/news/2012-11-14/dear-obama-if-texas-secedes-can-we-stay-with-you/ (http://www.austinchronicle.com/blogs/news/2012-11-14/dear-obama-if-texas-secedes-can-we-stay-with-you/)


Texas wants to secede, so Austin wants to stay. I'm totally fine with that, because we ARE better than the rest of Texas who're pitching a bitchfit over the election for really no good reason.


I get shit all the time for being liberal when really, I have issues I'm conservative about, and I have issues that I'm liberal about, but the REAL fact of the matter is, I am anti-idiocy. And half of the US is being fucking retarded.
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Brandy Bogard on November 15, 2012, 04:26:50 PM
I'd be okay if they were seceding because they were fed up with what the States have been doing lately (eg. TSA bullshit, drone strikes in the Middle East, censorship laws disguised as IP protection) but seceding because "one of dem uppity niggers wuz electid?"

Fuck that. And of course, we know all too well what happen the last time states decided to secede, and it was over the abolition of something not really that ethical.
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Jango on November 16, 2012, 03:31:11 AM
See if Texas can seriously secede from America, why is it that Hawaii hasn't been able to do jack in the last half century?
Title: Re: We're not doomed.
Post by: Jesuszilla on November 16, 2012, 10:15:05 AM
Variety, I guess?